Ergonomic Consulting, Ergonomic Training, Ergonomic Products
Ergonomic Consulting and Ergonomic Training
Ergonomic Products
Ergonomic News & Information

Home |  Sitemap |  About |  Contact

Decrease font Font Size Increase font

Search:       


   Login   
   Register   



News/Information

»

Media Advisory Board

»

Ergonomics Today™

»

The Ergonomics Report™

»

Forum / Discussions

»

Case Studies

»

Reference Materials






Applied Workplace Ergonomics Manual



TeachWell Mobile Digital Platform



MAXUM Mats & Runners

Ergonomics Today™
Quick news--Open Access

Researchers Want Engine Noise Added to Too-Quiet Hybrids

January 25, 2009
By Jennifer Anderson


Share This Article Share This Article LinkedIn StumbleUpon Facebook
Follow us to get the latest developments and updates from Ergoweb®.

When it comes to hybrid cars, silence is not so blessed. Human factors researchers at North Carolina State University say the vehicles are too quiet for safety  pedestrians and bicyclists can't hear them coming. The researchers want hybrid manufacturers to build in some noise, and recommend automotive engine sounds.
 
In their paper published in the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52nd Annual Meeting, Patrick Nyeste and Michael S. Wogalter evaluated the responses of 24 participants (mean age = 19.4 years) to six categories of noise: engine, horn, hum, siren, whistle and white noise. Three variations of each type of sound were tested.

By a wide margin, the participants preferred automotive engine sounds. It is noise associated with a familiar danger. White noise was ranked second, with a hum in third place. 

A news release about the findings, published recently by the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES), notes that automakers have continually worked to make passenger vehicles quieter, and now find themselves with a need to make their quietest vehicles louder. Noise pollution could be avoided, if a “smart system” alters the level of emitted sound depending on the levels of vehicle and background environmental sound. These systems would turn themselves off if the vehicle produces adequate sound on its own.
 
Lotus Engineering is addressing the quiet hybrid issue, according to the HFES news release, with its "Safe and Sound" system, which mimics the sound of an internal combustion engine and operates when the vehicle is in electric-only mode.

The researchers note that their findings also apply to other silent vehicles. Electric golf carts, bicycles, wheelchairs and Segways have caused injuries because they are quiet.
 
The National Federation for the Blind has called for quiet vehicles to emit a continuous sound and for additional research on the subject.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, automobile manufacturers and the Society of Automotive Engineers International are exploring solutions to the problem. The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2008, which would require the Secretary of Transportation to study and implement regulations for hybrid, electric, and other silent-engine vehicles to emit nonvisual alerts for pedestrians, is under consideration in the United States Congress.

Source: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Previous Article Next Article

Comments on this Article:
BobWilson, January-26-2009

"The Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2008," H.R. 5734, died in committee with the new Congress. It died in part because the Fatal Accident Recording System, the National Highway Safety Administration database, shows none of the 500,000 silent Prius have never killed a blind pedestrian and they have the same pedestrian accident rate as ordinary cars. In short, there are no bodies and the NHTSA has yet to find any evidence of a risk. This effort is nonsense when only 5 blind pedestrians die each year out of 4,700 pedestrian deaths. It is a waste of time and budgets that should address the real risks to pedestrian safety.

Bob Wilson
625k Inc.
Huntsville, AL


BobWilson, January-30-2009

Apparently a day or so later, H.R. 734, the 2009 version of this bill was introduced. As of yesterday, the text of the bill had yet to show up in the usual web sites. Regardless, legislation does not change the facts and data.

There is a story about Celtic King Chanute commanding the tide to stop. Legislation does not change the empirical facts and data and we still have yet to find accident data, empirical data, showing hybrid electric cars are a greater risk to pedestrians. Yet another day will pass and more pedestrians will die while this nonsense steals resources away from real deaths and injuries.

There is a principle in English Law, 'Habius corpus', that means show us the evidence of a crime. That fundamental, first step was missing with HR 5734, the predecessor and that remains an open question for HR 734. Show us the bodies, the accident data supporting these claims, not a scripted test. Show us that the discipline of science is being followed.

Bob Wilson


Please login to comment. New users may register now (it's free!).


Related Articles:

News - Ergonomics Today™ - Open Access

»

  Research: Drivers Overestimate Their Skills, Underestimate Risk of Distractions
May 18, 2009

»

  Are Cell Phones Dangerous? It's Still An Open Question
July 27, 2005

»

  Forklifts – A Study in Flawed Ergonomics
April 5, 2006

»

  You Can Learn a Lot From a Robot
December 1, 2002

»

  Infections Make Hospital a Risky Business for Patients
February 14, 2007

  Click to verify BBB accreditation and to see a BBB report.  

Recommend This Page Recommend This Page Printable Page

Copyright © 1995-2010 Ergoweb, Inc.  Terms of Use.  Privacy Statement.