Ergonomic Consulting, Ergonomic Training, Ergonomic Products
Ergonomic Consulting and Ergonomic Training
Ergonomic Products
Ergonomic News & Information

Home |  Sitemap |  About |  Contact

Decrease font Font Size Increase font

Search:       


   Login   
   Register   



News/Information

»

Media Advisory Board

»

Ergonomics Today™

»

The Ergonomics Report™

»

Forum / Discussions

»

Case Studies

»

Reference Materials






WorkFit-S, Single HD Sit-Stand Workstation



EVO™ LCD Arm



Banana-Board® Keyboard Platform (with Pinnacle 2 Arm option)

Ergonomics Today™
Quick news--Open Access

Study Suggests Boring Work may be Deadly Work

May 27, 2002
By R. Michael


Share This Article Share This Article LinkedIn StumbleUpon Facebook
Follow us to get the latest developments and updates from Ergoweb®.
New research published in the Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine suggests that people who spend more of their working lives in jobs where they have little input in what work to do and how to go about doing it tend to die earlier than employees given more decision-making opportunities.

Some of the factors noted in the study such as monotonous work, and input into work design can be studied under the umbrella of macro-ergonomics. Techniques such as job enlargement and enrichment look at how to improve work that is monotonous or leaves little room for worker input.

Organizations such as the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and European health and safety bodies have long recognized that in addition to causing independent problems in the workplace, work that is monotonous or in which the employee has little input may increase the risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

According to researchers at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, people assigned a low decision-making role in the workplace died even earlier than those in highly demanding positions. The study consisted of surveys of the physical and psychological working conditions of 5,000 households. Study participants were surveyed from 1968 to 1991.

Jobs were classified according to decision-making opportunities, psychological demands, security, support and physical demands.

The study concluded that people who spent their working lives in jobs where they had to make the fewest decisions were 43% more likely to die than people in jobs with a lot of decision-making opportunities. Also, people who spent their working lives in passive jobs, described as those with low demands and low control over what work they do and when, were also 35% more likely to die. In both cases, these findings were significant up to 10 years after the job ended.

Study authors encourage both employees and employers to look for ways to enhance the working experience citing that it often does not adversely affect productivity as some might perceive.

For more information on this study, reference the journal Psychosomatic Medicine 2002;64:370-381.

Previous Article Next Article

Comments on this Article:
DavidMillstone, July-7-2010

"The study concluded that people who spent their working lives in jobs where they had to make the fewest decisions were 43% more likely to die than people in jobs with a lot of decision-making opportunities."
43% more likely to die? What the hell does that even mean?


karenc.rowe42723, July-15-2010

I believe it. I have one of those jobs.

Peter Budnick, July-15-2010

David, good question. I don't have easy access to the original article, but I note that this was a long term study (1968-1991), and I believe they used deaths of subjects that occurred during the study to arrive at the "43% more likely" figure.

RonaldAB42279, July-15-2010

Sounds like the study identified that 43% of the study population were in positions out of alignment with their personal growth need strength. The pervasive challenge is identifying those solutions that fit the individual...right back to the root of ergonomics.

kmarion, July-15-2010

David: There was one key word missing in that phrase, that being "earlier". There is some reality in that old term stating that there are only two things certain in life: death and taxes. Apparently this study reinforces the notion that we all have an inherent need to contribute and have a sense of significance. Those who have jobs that stifle that or contributes to/reinforces the sense of unimportance eventually also plays into their frustration with life (higher blood pressure, greater risk factors, less initiative to exercise, etc). Psychosocial contributions to job satisfaction and job performance have always been some of the hardest elements to measure, much less factor into potential ergonomic intervention to make jobs more satisfying for workers. Worker apathy is also one of the hardest factors to counter in work situations.

Please login to comment. New users may register now (it's free!).


Possibly Related Articles (automatically generated):

News - Ergonomics Today™ - Open Access

»

  NIOSH Expands Focus on Women and MSDs
November 19, 2001

»

  Ergonomics Roundup: January 20, 2010
January 20, 2010
How do I subscribe?

»

  Macroergonomics is Better Economics
January 11, 2006

»

  Research: Occupational Stress Index Shows Promise as New Assessment Tool
November 5, 2008

»

  Researchers Look Upstream to Mitigate Ergonomic Risk Factors for Residential Carpenters
April 29, 2009

  Click to verify BBB accreditation and to see a BBB report.  

Recommend This Page Recommend This Page Printable Page

Copyright © 1995-2010 Ergoweb, Inc.  Terms of Use.  Privacy Statement.