Outcome Assessment Of
Occupational Carpal Tunnel Syndrome In A Cohort Of Truck Assembly
Workers
Robin S. Baver, M.D., M.P.H. (A)
Al Franzblau, M.D.(B)
William B. Bunn, M.D., M.P.H. (A)
(A) Navistar International Transportation
Corporation
6125 Urbana Road
Springfield, Ohio 45502
(B) The University of Michigan School of Public
Health
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
ABSTRACT
The first objective of this study was to perform a detailed
analysis of the outcome following treatment of occupational CTS
in a well-defined cohort of truck assembly workers utilizing a
specific case definition for cohort construction and detailed
follow-up information. The computerized workers' compensation
claims management data base and the factory workers' individual
occupational medical records were used to generate the outcome
assessment. The results were compared, qualitatively, to those
previously reported in the literature. Finally, formal assessment
of the return to work and restriction experience of those
post-treatment for occupational CTS provided an estimate of
on-going impairment and its impact upon the occupational
functional level of the production workforce. The occupational
CTS cohort consisted of 133 cases arising between 1/1/89 and
12/31/92. Greater than 97% of the cohort undergoing surgical
release were able to resume their previous job following
treatment. Generally, lost work time occurred only for
post-operative recovery and most cases returned to work with
either no or short-term activity restrictions. This experience is
more positive than that reported for other occupational groups.
Conservatively treated cases more frequently received activity
restrictions and, in general, did not involve lost work time.
INTRODUCTION
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly encountered
compression neuropathy of the upper extremity, with annual
cumulative incidence of 0.1% in the general population1
and up to 5% in certain occupational groups2.
Occupational CTS is a major cause of lost work days and workers'
compensation cost in the United States; carpal tunnel release is
the most commonly performed operation on the hand, accounting for
approximately 200,000 procedures per year in the United States
and incurring direct medical expenses in excess of 1 billion
dollars annually3. Scant data
exist in the medical literature regarding outcome following
surgical or conservative treatment of occupational CTS. The few
studies assessing outcome have been limited by the lack of a
specific case definition, relatively non-detailed follow-up
information, and the use of general indices such as return to
work (as a dichotomous variable) and duration of time loss as
outcome measures. In one investigation of a meat packing plant,
only 52% of those surgically treated had returned to their
previous employment after one year4. A recent
evaluation of occupational CTS outcome in Washington State
revealed that 82% of surgical cases returned to either their same
job or a different job5. Mean time loss
post-operatively was 113 days, but 8% experienced time loss in
excess of one year. Previous studies of occupational CTS outcome
have reported only post-surgical experience and thus no data are
available in the literature regarding outcome with conservative
management of the condition. Additionally, no studies to date
have assessed outcome with respect to restricted activity or
on-going periodic disability following treatment.
METHODS
Description of Source for Study Population
Navistar International is a mid-size and heavy truck
manufacturer. The Springfield Operations include two major
manufacturing and assembly facilities, the Body and Assembly
Plants. Cabs for all models of International trucks are
fabricated at the Body Plant, from forming of basic metal cab
componentry through stamping and welding operations to final
assembly of the cabs. At the Springfield Assembly Plant, complete
assembly of the International trucks, from basic components to
completed product, is performed. The two facilities share a
common hourly workforce numbering approximately 5000 which is
represented by the United Auto Workers; this is an aged (mean age
= 50 years), experienced (mean years company service = 27),
predominantly male (96%) occupational cohort performing heavy
manual processes which are repetitive, and often vibratory, in
nature. Job placement is based upon seniority. An incentive piece
work payment system is utilized in a portion of the Springfield
Body Plant facility, further discouraging appropriate recovery
time breaks and pacing of activities.
Construction of Occupational CTS Cohort and Outcome
Evaluation
The cohort of Navistar Springfield Operations
factory workers developing occupational CTS between 1989 and 1992
was constructed in the following manner:
The CTS case definition and inclusion/exclusion
criteria for the study cohort were set.
The computerized workers' compensation data base
was accessed to identify potential cases occurring between 1/1/89
and 12/31/92.
An individual medical record review for each
potential case was performed to obtain clinical variables
utilized in the evaluation of the case definition and
inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Follow-up of each cohort member via individual
medical record review, spanning from date of diagnosis to date of
withdrawal from the cohort (secondary to death, termination,
retirement, or long-term medical disability not related to CTS)
or the study cut-off date of 3/31/95, was accomplished and
included elucidation of lost and restricted work days on the
claim, claim cost, return to work status, and the occurrence and
timing of temporary or permanent work restrictions. Outcome
measures were summarized for the entire cohort and then analyzed
with stratification as to type of treatment received
(conservative vs. surgical).
RESULTS
Cohort Characterization
The Navistar Springfield Operations computerized
worker's compensation claims management system revealed that 140
claims for carpal tunnel syndrome were allowed from among the
population of factory workers between 1/1/89 and 12/31/92. From
the 140 potential cases, 7 were eliminated due to not meeting the
case definition and/or the inclusion criteria; thus, the study
population included 133 cases of occupational CTS. The 133 cases
accumulated 515.5 person-years of follow-up observation; each
case was observed for a mean of 3.88 yrs following diagnosis.
Mean age and mean years of company service of the occupational
CTS cases at the time of diagnosis were 46.5 yrs and 22.6 yrs,
respectively. Of the 133 cohort members, 130 (97.7%) were male,
which is understandable given the predominantly male Navistar
factory worker population (96% male) from which the cases arose.
Eighty (60.2%) of the occupational CTS claims were for bilateral
disease; of the 53 unilateral cases, 39 involved only the right
hand and 14 involved only the left. Over the follow-up period,
118 cases underwent surgical release while 15 were managed
conservatively. Independent of hand involved, approximately 89%
of the cohort underwent surgical release; of the 71 bilateral
occupational CTS cases undergoing surgery, 62 (87.3%) had surgery
bilaterally.
Lost and Light Duty Days and Claim Cost
The overall mean lost work days, mean light duty
days, and mean claim cost for the entire occupational CTS cohort
were 71.4 days, 7.6 days, and $13329. Median lost work days for
the entire cohort was 54.0 days and 75% of cases accumulated less
than 90 lost work days. Table 1 summarizes the lost and light
duty days and claim cost for the occupational CTS cohort,
stratified by hand involvement and type of treatment. Mean lost
work days for surgically treated cases of unilateral and
bilateral disease were 58.1 d and 94.9 d, respectively.
Conservatively treated cases had low mean lost work days; only
one of the fifteen conservative cases involved lost work time.
There was very strong evidence (p=0.000) for differences in mean
lost work days among the hand involvement and treatment status
groups. As the greatest Worker's Compensation cost is typically
the payment of temporary total disability, mean claim costs for
each category were also significantly different and tracked with
lost work days.
The data were also analyzed with stratification
upon total number of surgical releases on the claim. These data
are summarized in Table 2. Both lost work days and claim cost
increased with increasing number of carpal tunnel releases (CTR)
per claim and the differences in means for both variables were
statistically significant.
Work and Restriction Status
Return to work status following treatment (date
of diagnosis for conservatively treated cases and date of return
to work (RTW) after last initial CTR for surgically treated
cases) over the follow-up period was assessed for 132 of the 133
cohort members. Table 3 provides a tabulation of return to work
status for the overall cohort and by treatment type selected.
Overall, 61.4 % of the cohort returned to work without any formal
restricted activity of the upper extremities over the follow-up
period. Seventy-eight percent of the cohort returned to work with
less than or equal to thirty days of formal light duty for the
upper extremities over the follow-up period; the corresponding
values for conservatively and surgically treated cases were 73.3%
and 78.6%, respectively. Self-selection by each employee/case
away from aggravating activities would not be reflected in these
data and cannot be excluded. Only 3.0% (4/132) of the cohort
members reviewed either did not, or failed after attempt to,
return to work over the follow-up period. Three of these four
cases were post-surgical whereas one was a conservatively treated
case. Three of the four cases had additional medical conditions
contributing to the on-going disability so that occupational CTS
was not the sole cause of disability. Of those cohort members who
did return to work, 11.7% required permanent duty restrictions
with respect to the upper extremities. A greater percentage of
conservatively treated cases than surgical cases received
permanent duty restrictions affecting the upper extremities (21.4
% vs. 10.5 %) but this difference was not statistically
significant (p<0.21).
Outcome for "Standard" vs.
"Non-standard" Treatment
Considering one surgical release per affected
hand as the standard surgical treatment, it was noted if any lost
work days occurred following return to work for the last initial
CTR. Of the 118 surgically treated cases, 14 experienced lost
work days after return to work from their last initial CTR. The
mean lost work days for this group was 200.7 days whereas for
those only requiring standard treatment the mean lost work days
was 64.2 days (p=0.000). Correspondingly, the mean claim cost for
each group was $31091.1 and $12727.8 (p=0.000). Of the 15 cases
treated conservatively, only one case involved lost work days;
the other fourteen electing conservative treatment were non-lost
time cases. The lost work days and claim cost of the one
lost-time conservatively treated case were 33 and $7523.0;
comparatively, the mean lost work days and mean claim cost of the
14 non-lost-time cases were 0 and $407.4.
Similarly, 8 of the 118 surgically treated cases
required more than one CTR on at least one side. There was no
difference between unilateral and bilateral cases with respect to
the proportion requiring more than one CTR/side (2/47 vs. 6/71,
p<0.474). There were statistically significant differences in
the mean lost work days and mean claim costs for the group
requiring more than one CTR/side vs. the group which did not
(mean LWD- 237.9 days vs. 68.8 days and mean cost- $32483.8 vs.
$13633.4, p=0.000 for both).
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In summary, for this occupational CTS cohort over
the follow-up period, most surgically treated cases were
successfully managed with one CTR per affected hand and
accumulated lost time only for the initial CTR on each side; the
mean lost work days and mean claim cost for such "standard
treatment" were 45.9 days and $9077.6 for unilateral release
and 80.1 days and $15913.5 for bilateral releases. Most cases
were able to return to work following surgery with either no
restrictions or short term light duty. The post-operative return
to work experience in this cohort (97.4% at mean follow-up of 3.9
years) is more positive than that reported for meat packing and
for Washington state where 52% were working 1 year post-op4
and 82% of cases were working 3 years post-op5,
respectively. For the small number of cases in which lost time
occurred after standard surgical treatment and/or more than one
CTR/side was performed, mean lost work days and mean claim cost
were significantly greater. In general, the conservatively
treated cases did not accumulate lost work time, involved low
cost, and more frequently required formal, permanent upper
extremity restrictions.
Shortcomings of these data sources include no way
to capture the role persistent hand symptomatology may play in
retirement decisions for those cohort members with the necessary
age and service, no way to measure self-selection away from jobs
which may aggravate persistent hand symptomatology, and no way to
assess persistent hand symptomatology which does not interfere
with employee placement (employee performs activities with
toleration of any hand symptoms which occur).
Little information exists regarding long term
functional outcomes for either conservative or surgical
management of occupational CTS. No studies to date have directly
assessed on-going symptomatology or factors which may be
predictive of long-term poor outcome with this condition. No
objective data are currently available regarding expected
recurrence rates or symptomatology patterns following treatment
for occupational CTS. Therefore, direct assessment of this cohort
through a symptom survey, electrophysiologic screening, and
anthropometric and physical examinations could provide insight
into these issues and represents a natural follow-on to this
effort.
REFERENCES
| 1. Stevens J.C., S.
Sun, C.M. Beard, W.M. O'Fallon, and L.T. Kurland:
Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to
1980. NEUROLOGY. 38:134-138 (1988). |
| 2. G. Franklin, J.
Haug, N. Heyer, H. Checkoway, and N. Peck:
Occupational carpal tunnel syndrome in Washington state,
1984-1988. American Journal of Public Health.81:741-46
(1991). |
| 3. D. Levine, B
Simmons, M Koris, L Daltroy, G Hohl, A Fossel, and J
Katz: A self-administered questionnaire for the
assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status
in carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Bone & Joint
Surgery. 75-A:1585-92 (1993). |
| 4. V. Masear, J. Jayes,
and A. Hyde: An industrial cause of carpal tunnel
syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery. 11A:222-7
(1986). |
| 5. M. Adams, G.
Franklin,and S. Barnhart: Outcome of carpal tunnel
surgery in Washington state workers' compensation. American
Journal of Industrial Medicine. 25:527-36 (1994).
|
Table 1. Mean lost and light
duty days and claim cost for the Navistar Springfield Operations
Occupational CTS cohort.
| Hand Involvement Unilateral Bilateral
|
| Type of Treatment: |
Conservative (N=6)
|
Surgical (N=47)
|
Conservative (N=9)
|
Surgical (N=71)
|
ANOVA results (p-value)
|
| Mean Values of: |
| Lost Work Days |
0.0 |
58.1 |
3.7 |
94.9 |
0.000 |
| Light Duty Days |
13.3 |
4.1 |
6.9 |
9.4 |
0.042 |
| Claim Cost ($) |
271.8 |
11453.4 |
1288.4 |
17200.4 |
0.000 |
Table 2. Mean lost and light
duty days and claim cost for the Navistar Springfield Operations
Occupational CTS cohort as a function of number of surgical
releases per claim.
| |
Number of
carpal tunnel releases |
| Mean values of: |
0 (N=15)
|
1 (N=52)
|
2 (N=62)
|
3 or more (N=4)
|
ANOVA results |
| Lost work days |
2.2 |
50.8 |
95.7 |
223.5 |
0.000 |
| Light duty days |
11.7 |
9.3 |
11.1 |
22.6 |
0.059 |
| Claim Cost ($) |
881.8 |
10565.2 |
17281.0 |
34682.0 |
0.000 |
Table 3. Working and restriction status with
respect to upper extremities of the Navistar Springfield
Operations Occupational CTS cohort over the follow-up period.
| |
Work and restriction status
over the follow-up period:
|
| |
Return to work without restrictions |
Return to work with restrictions less
than 30 contiguous days |
Return to work with restrictions greater
than 30 contiguous days, but subsequently removed |
Return to work with permanent
restrictions |
No or failed return to work attributed,
at least in part, to Occupational CTS |
Total |
| Treatment type: |
| Conservative |
7 (46.7%) |
4 (26.7%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (20%) |
1 (6.7%) |
15 (100%) |
| Surgical |
74 (63.2%) |
18 (15.4%) |
10 (8.5%) |
12 (10.3%) |
3 (2.6%) |
117 (100%) |
| Total |
81 (61.4%) |
22 (16.7%) |
10 (7.6%) |
15 (11.4%) |
4 (3.0%) |
132 (100%) |